Navigating the Uncertainty of New Ideas: Building Consensus in the Workplace

September 23, 2024
  • Innovation is crucial for competitive advantage, but new ideas often face resistance due to differing perceptions and a lack of shared evaluation standards among decision-makers.
  • Research shows that novel ideas encounter increased perceived risk when team members have varying opinions on their value, leading to reduced support.
  • Establishing shared criteria for evaluating new ideas can reduce subjectivity, facilitate constructive discussions, and align teams toward common goals.
  • Clear evaluation frameworks help manage diverse perspectives without chaos, promoting an environment where innovative ideas can thrive.
  • Practical steps for leaders include holding pre-evaluation sessions to agree on criteria, understanding team perspectives, and implementing a scoring system for objective assessments.


670 words ~ 3.5 min. read


Innovation is often viewed as essential for gaining a competitive edge, but new ideas frequently face pushback within organizations. Research indicates that the uniqueness of an idea can lead to rejection because of perceived risks. Recently, it's become clear that there's a bigger issue: decision-makers often lack shared standards for assessing the value of an innovation. This disconnect causes differing views on the potential success of new ideas, which ultimately stifles innovation efforts. It’s important to address this disconnect, as bringing decision-makers together on standards can create a more supportive environment for innovation, driving progress and helping maintain a competitive edge.


Diverging Perceptions Make Innovation Feel Risky

A recent study shows that the more novel an idea is, the more opinions differ about its potential value, which can become a risk factor. When team members perceive the same idea very differently, the perceived risk associated with the innovation increases. As a result, people are less likely to support it—not because the idea is flawed, but due to a lack of shared understanding of its benefits or drawbacks.

Researchers found that differing views on an idea's potential create a psychological barrier to support, especially without a common framework for discussion. In these cases, decision-makers may rely on personal biases or past experiences, leading to the rejection of potentially groundbreaking ideas. This underscores the need for open dialogue and a shared understanding within teams so that innovative ideas receive the evaluation they deserve, rather than being dismissed too early.


The Importance of Shared Criteria for Evaluating Ideas

 

One main point from this research is the need for shared criteria when assessing new ideas. Without a common framework, discussions about innovation can become scattered and unproductive. When team members view an idea from different perspectives, it can lead to debates that focus more on defending personal opinions instead of objectively evaluating the idea.

To address this issue, leaders and teams should create clear and agreed-upon criteria for evaluating new ideas, which brings several benefits:

  • Reduces Subjectivity: With a standardized set of criteria, teams are less likely to let personal biases or gut feelings influence evaluations. Discussions focus on measurable and relevant factors like market potential, feasibility, alignment with strategic goals, and the idea's ability to solve problems.
  • Facilitates Constructive Discussions: Clear criteria allow discussions to center on how well an idea meets specific standards instead of arguing about the idea's validity. This approach fosters more productive conversations that can help improve an idea rather than dismissing it too soon.
  • Encourages Diverse Input Without Chaos: Different perspectives are essential for innovation, but they must be managed effectively. Using clear evaluation criteria can help organize diverse ideas within a team by providing a common language and framework for discussion, reducing confusion and encouraging constructive feedback.
  • Aligns Teams Around a Common Goal: When everyone understands what makes a "good idea" based on shared goals and criteria, it's easier to support new concepts. This alignment is essential for creating an innovative culture where new ideas are not only generated but also actively promoted and effectively implemented.


Practical Steps to Build Consensus on Innovation Evaluation

To create a more unified approach to evaluating new ideas, implement the following strategies:

  • Hold Pre-Evaluation Sessions: Bring the team together to agree on evaluation criteria aligned with strategic objectives and innovation goals.
  • Use a Scoring System: Implement a scoring system to objectively rate each idea based on the agreed criteria, making comparisons easier.
  • Emphasize Psychological Safety: Foster an environment where team members feel safe to share diverse opinions, allowing for fair assessment of ideas.


Bottom Line

The journey from coming up with ideas to putting them into action can be uncertain, especially with new concepts. However, teams can manage this uncertainty better by setting up a common framework to evaluate new ideas. By agreeing on clear criteria, organizations can reduce perceived risks and foster a more inclusive and dynamic culture of innovation. The key to overcoming fear of the unknown is building consensus and trust, allowing teams to confidently embrace new ideas with clear strategies.

 



---

The Leavenworth-Lansing Area Chamber of Commerce is a private non-profit organization that aims to support the growth and development of local businesses and our regional economy. We strive to create content that not only educates but also fosters a sense of connection and collaboration among our readers. Join us as we explore topics such as economic development, networking opportunities, upcoming events, and success stories from our vibrant community. Our resources provide insights, advice, and news that are relevant to business owners, entrepreneurs, and community members alike. The Chamber has been granted license to publish this content provided by Chamber Today, a service of ChamberThink Strategies LLC. 

Is Your Business Owner-Dependent?

January 20, 2026
Is Your Business Owner-Dependent?

How to Verify the Accuracy of an Applicant's Resume

January 13, 2026
75% of hiring managers have encountered lies on resumes, posing a challenge to the trustworthiness of applicant qualifications. Pruning outdated or irrelevant job experiences from resumes can help applicants highlight their most recent and pertinent skills. Checking for employment gaps can uncover important character traits or red flags, such as incarceration, which can be further explored through background checks. Up to 85% of job seekers admit to lying on resumes about aspects like job duties and skills, making independent verification crucial. Handling discovered resume discrepancies with professionalism and aligning hiring decisions with organizational values are key. Investing in thorough verification processes, despite initial costs, is essential for reducing long-term expenses related to unproductive wages, training, and turnover. 554 words ~ 2.5 min. read In today's job market, it's quite common for applicants to exaggerate on their resumes. A surprising find by CareerBuilder shows that 75% of hiring managers have spotted lies on resumes. This highlights a big problem in hiring - how can employers trust what's on a resume? With the honesty of candidate qualifications on the line, it's important for hiring managers to find reliable ways to check the accuracy of resumes to make good hiring decisions. Read on to discover three strategies to help you fast-track the fact-checking process. Prune Old Jobs Pruning old jobs simply means removing any outdated or irrelevant information. For example, if an applicant lists a job that they held 10 years ago and haven't worked in that field since, there's a good chance their skills are no longer up-to-date. The hiring platform Indeed reminds job hopefuls to prioritize their most recent and relevant experience , so including historical work experience may also signal a lack of confidence in applying for an intended position. Check for Gaps Another way to verify the accuracy of an applicant's resume is to check for gaps. This means looking for any periods of time where there is no employment listed. These gaps could be due to a variety of reasons, such as taking time off to raise a family or going back to school. However, they could also be due to something less savory, such as incarceration. Including a background check will reveal gaps due to jail time but also other important things you may want to know like criminal arrest records or driving history. Resume gaps aren’t always a bad thing, of course. They may reveal an applicant’s character or important values, with gaps devoted to honing their leadership skills through volunteering for schools or charitable organizations. What you do with your understanding of these blank spaces is what’s important — use them to weed out applicants or to ascertain if a candidate is a value match during the interview process. Fact-Check Claims According to Good Hire up to 85% of job seekers have admitted to lying on their resume. What are they lying about? Most often, dishonest claims relate to job duties, work experience, and job skills. While it may be easy to verify if an applicant has indeed graduated from Harvard or won Teacher of the Year, it can take much more time and resources to fact check work history and job duties. For that reason, many employers rely on independent recruiters and agencies to verify resume details. What should you do if you discover something that doesn’t check out? When hiring managers spot a lie on a resume, it's important to handle it with care and professionalism. First, double-check the facts to avoid any misunderstandings. If the lie is real, talk to the applicant about it and listen to their side of the story. Then, based on how serious the lie is, decide if you still want to consider the candidate. In the end, your decision should align with your organization’s values. If you do hire someone and later discover the lie, experts recommend confronting the employee to learn more. If you want to terminate the employee, get legal counsel first. Takeaway Devoting time and resources to outside services will increase your hiring costs upfront. However, when you factor in the price tag for unproductive wages, in addition to training, firing, and rehiring costs, investing in a thorough verification process becomes a vital hiring and retention strategy. Read More: 10 Ways to Get the Most from your Chamber Membership Hiring in a Tight Market: Your Local Playbook for Finding and Keeping Great People The New Employee Benefit Everyone is Talking About The Power of 'Entry Interviews' and 'Stay Interviews' Strategies for Improving Employee Retention in Small Businesses --- The Leavenworth-Lansing Area Chamber of Commerce is a private non-profit organization that aims to support the growth and development of local businesses and our regional economy. We strive to create content that not only educates but also fosters a sense of connection and collaboration among our readers. Join us as we explore topics such as economic development, networking opportunities, upcoming events, and success stories from our vibrant community. Our resources provide insights, advice, and news that are relevant to business owners, entrepreneurs, and community members alike. The Chamber has been granted license to publish this content provided by Chamber Today, a service of ChamberThink Strategies LLC.

Think Twice Before Hiring or Promoting "Brilliant Jerks"

January 13, 2026
Think Twice Before Hiring or Promoting "Brilliant Jerks" Arianna Huffington criticizes valuing employees solely on brilliance, coining the term "brilliant jerks" for talented yet toxic workers "Brilliant jerks" can hide their toxic behaviors behind exceptional performance, complicating their identification and the management of their negative impact. Their presence can damage team unity, foster a toxic work environment, decrease morale and productivity, and lead to significant financial losses. Tolerating or rewarding such behavior normalizes toxicity and can drive away talented individuals, damaging the company's reputation and its ability to attract and retain top talent. Leaders often struggle to address these individuals due to their perceived value, despite the negative consequences on the team and overall work environment. Identifying toxic traits early, emphasizing emotional intelligence, and fostering teamwork in hiring and promotion processes can help create a healthier, more productive work environment. 547 words ~ 2.5 min read Arianna Huffington, the co-founder of The Huffington Post, famously criticized the practice of valuing employees solely based on their brilliance. She coined the term "brilliant jerks" for those who excel in their job but have a negative impact on the workplace. While it can be tempting to ignore interpersonal flaws for talent's sake, promoting or hiring such individuals often leads to long-term harm. Here, we delve into why this approach is problematic and highlight warning signs of toxic traits. Identifying "brilliant jerks" at work can be tricky. Their exceptional performance and creativity may hide toxic behaviors, making it hard for supervisors and colleagues to address their negative impact. Sometimes, these individuals are socially adept, which complicates recognizing their harmful traits. This dual nature causes confusion, as their value as high performers clashes with their negative influence. Their behavior might be situationally toxic, especially under stress, making it challenging to address effectively. The problem is "brilliant jerks" can significantly impede team unity. Their arrogance or aggression can foster a toxic environment, resulting in reduced morale and productivity among team members. When collaboration and mutual respect are undermined, innovation and efficiency are inevitably impacted. Studies indicate that toxic work environments lead to nearly $50 billion in annual losses for U.S. businesses , with a toxic culture being the leading cause of employee turnover in the initial six months of the Great Resignation. Unfortunately, tolerating or rewarding such behavior promotes disrespect, egoism, and a lack of empathy. This can normalize toxicity, driving away talented individuals who seek a positive work environment. In the long run, it undermines trust and collaboration, crucial for innovation and support. This damages the company's reputation and makes it hard to attract and keep top talent who value a healthy workplace. Dealing with these individuals can be tough due to their perceived value, even if their behavior is harmful. Leaders may fear losing their skills or impacting key projects, leading to tolerance of their actions. The misconception that high performers can behave differently can cloud decision-making, sending the wrong message to the team. It can be difficult to spot 'brilliant jerks' in the hiring process, but these red flags can help draw attention to traits that may overshadow stellar performance. If you do hire someone with these qualities by mistake, Huffington advises business leaders to act quickly: “Don't go there. And if you go there by mistake, fire them as fast as possible.” Red Flags of Toxic Traits: Empathy Deficit: Failing to grasp or appreciate others' feelings and viewpoints. Excessive Arrogance: Constantly asserting superiority over colleagues and disregarding their ideas outright. Resistance to Feedback: Being defensive towards criticism, viewing it as a personal attack rather than a chance for improvement. Manipulative Tactics: Using deceit or coercion to further personal objectives at the expense of others. "Brilliant jerks" love sharing private information in the form of 'secrets.' Social Withdrawal: Drifting apart from team activities and discussions, either by choice or due to others' reactions. Recognizing these red flags is crucial for fostering a healthy work environment. By placing a strong emphasis on emotional intelligence and teamwork during the hiring and promotion processes, organizations can cultivate a culture characterized by mutual respect and seamless collaboration. This, in turn, paves the way for achieving long-term success and sustainable growth. Read More: From Conflict to Collaboration: Turning Workplace Disputes into Growth Opportunities Hiring in a Tight Market: Your Local Playbook for Finding and Keeping Great People Rock Stars Vs. Superstars: Who's Fueling Your Team's Future?  --- The Leavenworth-Lansing Area Chamber of Commerce is a private non-profit organization that aims to support the growth and development of local businesses and our regional economy. We strive to create content that not only educates but also fosters a sense of connection and collaboration among our readers. Join us as we explore topics such as economic development, networking opportunities, upcoming events, and success stories from our vibrant community. Our resources provide insights, advice, and news that are relevant to business owners, entrepreneurs, and community members alike. The Chamber has been granted license to publish this content provided by Chamber Today, a service of ChamberThink Strategies LLC.